Investor Overview · 2025

3DPrintScore

An AI-powered analyzer that tells engineers exactly why their part will fail to print — and how to fix it. We're turning LPBF expertise into a score.

$4.1B
LPBF Market 2024
~40%
First-print failure rate
8.5/10
Printability score
23%
Industry CAGR 2024–30
01 / Problem

LPBF works.
Engineers — don't.

Laser Powder Bed Fusion can produce geometry impossible any other way. But between what the printer can do and what the average engineer knows — there's a chasm. The result: failed iterations, scrapped parts, and distrust of the technology.

01
No early feedback

Engineers discover design problems only after the part is already scrapped. Too late, too expensive.

02
Knowledge gap

DfAM expertise takes years to accumulate. Most engineers don't have it, and courses take months to complete.

03
Underutilized machines

Companies buy printers but run them at low utilization — out of fear of costly failures.

02 / Solution

Upload your model.
Get an answer.

3DPrintScore analyzes 3D part geometry against the chosen print technology and returns a specific, actionable score — right inside the design workflow.

📤
Upload Model

STL / STEP / OBJ. Select technology: LPBF, SLA, FDM and others — keeping the audience broad.

Input
🔍
Geometry Analysis

The engine checks overhang angles, wall thickness, enclosed channels, thermal masses, support requirements — against the specific technology's constraints.

Core
🗺️
Visual Highlighting

Problem zones are color-coded directly on the 3D model. Red = critical, Yellow = warning, Green = OK.

UX
💡
Score + Recommendations

Every issue comes with an explanation and a reference to industry best practices. Result: "Printability: 8.5/10 — here's what to fix."

Output
Analysis Result · Aerospace Bracket · LPBF Ti-6Al-4V
8.5
/10
58° overhang without supports on section B-7
→ Add self-supporting chamfer <45°
Wall thickness 0.18 mm — below technology minimum
→ Increase to 0.3 mm
Thermal masses — within acceptable range
✓ Good
03 / Market

Large market,
thin competition.

DfAM tools are either locked inside expensive PLM suites (Siemens NX, ANSYS) or simply don't exist as standalone products. 3DPrintScore captures the accessible SaaS analysis niche for engineers and print bureaus.

$4.1B

Global LPBF
equipment market

23%

Industry CAGR
2024–2030

+80K

New engineers
entering AM yearly

04 / Business Model

Freemium → B2B
subscription.

The free tier drives virality and market education. Paid plans monetize professional users and service bureaus.

PlanAudiencePriceKey Features
Free Viral Students, hobbyists$0 3 analyses/mo, basic technologies
Pro Core Engineers, freelancers$49/mo Unlimited analyses, LPBF + SLA + FDM, PDF export
Team B2B Design bureaus, R&D teams$299/mo API access, team collaboration, branded reports
Enterprise Manufacturers, print bureausCustom On-premise, PLM/ERP integration, SLA support
05 / Why Now

The market is ready
for this product.

2020

LPBF becomes accessible to SMBsPrinter prices dropped below $200K. Small businesses and bureaus started buying equipment.

2022

DfAM demand explodes"How do I design for AM?" became the 3rd most common question on GrabCAD and Reddit/r/3Dprinting.

2024

LLMs meet geometry enginesCombining mesh analysis with natural-language explanations is now accessible to a small team for the first time.

Now

The window is openMajor PLM vendors haven't reached the mass-market DfAM segment yet. We have an 18–24 month head start.

06 / Team

Built by someone who
has done this.

3DPrintScore isn't a software idea from a generalist. It's built by an engineer who has designed LPBF machines from scratch, published research on the technology, and felt the problem firsthand.

Founder & CEO
Maxim
Burmistrov
linkedin.com/in/maxim-burmistrov-world ↗
Founder & CEO of Addizone — building affordable LPBF printers in the USA
Led mechanical engineering team at AddSol — designed the full SLM printer line D50 → D500
Published LPBF researcher — co-authored peer-reviewed study on process optimization (MISIS / Skoltech)
Deep hands-on expertise: DfAM, Ansys, SolidWorks, LPBF process parameters
Why this founder wins
Domain depth
Has designed the machines, run the prints, published the research. Knows exactly which constraints matter — no guesswork in the rule engine.
Operator perspective
Running Addizone means daily contact with the exact pain point: engineers who can't design for LPBF. Built around real customer conversations, not assumptions.
Unfair distribution
Direct access to the AM community through Addizone's network — first beta users are already in the pipeline before a line of code is written.
07 / The Ask

$300K to reach
revenue in 90 days.

In the AI era, 18-month runways to first customers are a relic. We ship fast, iterate on real users, and hit revenue milestones in weeks — not years.

$300K

Pre-seed round. Deployed in phases over 6 months. First paying customer by week 10.

🛠️ Analyzer core development$120K
☁️ Infrastructure & SaaS platform$60K
📣 GTM: community + partnerships$60K
👥 Team (6 months)$60K
Week
1–2
Infrastructure live, closed beta opens
AI-generated geometry rules deployed. 50 engineers invited from GrabCAD / LinkedIn AM communities.
Week
3–6
500 beta users — rapid iteration loop
Weekly feature drops. NPS tracked. Partnerships with 2 print bureaus activated.
Week
10
🎯 First paying customers — Pro plan launches
Target: 30 Pro subscriptions ($49/mo) = $1,470 MRR on day one of monetization.
Week
14–18
First Team deals close — $15K+ MRR
3–5 Team contracts ($299/mo) from bureau partners. Enterprise pipeline opens. Series A conversations begin.
Month
6
Series A ready — $30K+ MRR, 1K+ users
Strong unit economics, proven retention. Raise $2–3M to scale GTM and expand technology coverage.

Let's build the standard
for printable design.

If you've read this far, you see the opportunity. Let's talk.

Write to us — ceo@addiz.one